From www.astrology-and-science.com Click here to return to home page
Koen Van de moortel
From his book Astro-Logics, Ghent, Belgium 2002, pages 100-102.
Abstract -- Horary astrology seems ideal for testing because it produces concrete yes/no answers. But its rules are often ambiguous and subject to disagreement even though they are said to be based on years of experience. So why the disagreement? Its concrete answers should have produced agreement, not disagreement. Evidently something is wrong with the way astrologers draw conclusions from experience (a process explored in the articles on faulty reasoning under Tests & Snags). Four references.Click here for full article (will include abstract) or Click here for home page
Full article is 6 kB, needs 1-2 pages of A4, takes 3 minutes to read, has no graphics.